𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effects of mixing time on phase structure and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/ polycarbonate blends

✍ Scribed by M. García; J. I. Eguiazábal; J. Nazábal


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
244 KB
Volume
81
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-8995

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The effects of interchange reactions on the solid‐state structure and mechanical properties of a 70/30 poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/bisphenol A polycarbonate (PC) blend were studied. Increasing reaction levels were obtained by means of lower screw speeds in the extruder. The progressive production of copolymers with the reaction time increased the amount of each component in the other phase. The concomitant degradation of PET led to a maximum in ductility and tensile and impact strengths whereas the modulus of elasticity and the yield stress were held constant. The maximum in properties took place at a reaction time close to 2.6 min; at longer reaction times the negative effect of degradation began to overcome the positive effect of the interchange reactions. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 121–127, 2001


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effects of molecular weight on phase str
✍ Mizuho Takahashi; Masayoshi Ito; Shinichiro Ida; Tokimitsu Ikawa 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 175 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The phase structure of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends was studied in relation to the molecular weight. The samples were prepared by both solution blends, which showed two glass‐transition temperatures (__T__~__g__~), and melt blends (MQ), wh

Mechanical and Rheological Properties of
✍ Cheung, Man Ken; Chan, David 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 417 KB 👁 2 views

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) and polypropylene (PET/PP) were compounded and pelletized with a single-screw extruder. Standard ASTM tensile test specimens were made by injection moulding. The blends are stronger and sti †er than the plain PP specimens. The addition of a compatibilizer, EPOLENE E-43,