Effects of electronic delocalization on intramolecular proton transfer
β Scribed by Richard M. Tarkka; Samson A. Jenekhe
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 433 KB
- Volume
- 260
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2614
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The effects of molecular size, conjugation length, and competition with excimer formation on excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) in conjugated polymers, in which the intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded moieties reside in the main chain, were examined. A large extent of T-electron delocalization is found to inhibit the ESIPT process. Excimer formation is found to be competitive with ESIPT in the polymers studied, whereas molecular size does not inhibit ES1PT.
The proton transfer reaction is ubiquitous in chemistry, biology, materials science, and other areas. The transfer of a hydrogen atom is the simplest of all atom transfer reactions and can be modeled by Marcus' theory [1]. Some molecules rearrange via an intramolecular proton transfer upon photoexcitation, a process known as excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) [2-4], which was first described by Weller [5]. In the case of HBO (1, see Scheme 1), the hydrogen atom transfer generally occurs very rapidly, with time constants in the subpicosecond time regime [6]. The radiative portion of deactivation of the keto form occurs at wavelengths significantly Stokes shifted (> 6000 cm -~ ) from the absorption. After photoexcitation, a population inversion of the keto tautomer results, which enables
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The central C atom of the OCCCO skeleton of the malonaldehyde molecule is replaced by N, and the effects upon the intramolecular H-bond and the proton transfer are monitored by ab initio calculations in the ground and excited electronic states. The H-bond is weakened in the singlet and triplet state
## Abstract The relative stabilities of glycine tautomers involved in the intramolecular proton transfer are investigated computationally by considering glycineβwater complexes containing up to five water molecules. The supermolecule results are compared with continuum calculations. Specific solute
When first published, the received data was omitted. The correct version appears above. We would like to extend our sincere apologies for any confusion this error may have caused.