𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effects of electrical stimulation of the central nucleus of the amygdala on the in vivo electrophysiological activity of rat nigral dopaminergic neurons

✍ Scribed by Claude Rouillard; Arthur S. Freeman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
895 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0887-4476

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) receives a dopaminergic (DA) innervation from the midbrain. Among its many efferent projections, the CeA innervates the substantia nigra. The possibility that the CeA influences the activity of nigral DA neurons was evaluated. The effects of electrical stimulation of the CeA on the firing rate and pattern of nigral DA neurons were investigated in anesthetized rats. Poststimulus time histograms revealed that nigral DA cells were either inhibited (N = 151, excited (N = 13), or unresponsive (N = 17) to CeA stimulation (250 stimuli a t 0.5 Hz). The mean (2SEM) latency to inhibition (24 t 9 msec) was significantly shorter than that for excitation (65 ? 10 msec); the duration of inhibition (200 2 29 msec) was also significantly greater than the duration of excitation (86 t 11 msec) (P < 0.01 for both). DA cells that were excited had basal firing rates significantly lower than those of the inhibited or unresponsive cells ( P < 0.05). Preliminary data suggest that DA cell burst-firing increases or decreases, respectively, in association with stimulation-evoked increases or decreases in firing rate. The relatively long latencies for stimulation-evoked responses suggest that CeA projection neurons indirectly affect nigral DA neurons via polysynaptic pathways. These results demonstrate that the CeA has the ability to influence the activity of nigral DA neurons, consistent with the putative role of the CeA as a n interface between the limbic and extrapyramidal systems. Given the crucial role of the amygdala in anxiety states, these findings suggest that DA cell function may also be affected in such disorders. o 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Characterization of the electrophysiolog
✍ Mya C. Schiess; Patrick M. Callahan; Hua Zheng πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 376 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

Forty central amygdala neurons labelled with 2% Neurobiotin were categorized according to their distinctive bioelectrical membrane properties and classified physiologically by their hyperpolarized resting membrane potential (؊74 mV), short duration medium afterhyperpolarization (239.2 ms), and nonac

Electrophysiological response of neurons
✍ J.M. SalmerΓ³n; G. Escames; J.M. PΓ©rez-Jaranay; F. Vives πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 370 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The neural connections from the nucleus accumbens to the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus were investigated in urethane-anesthetized rats. Extracellular recordings were made from 84 spontaneously firing neurons in the mediodorsal nucleus of the thalamus while the nucleus accumbens was electricall

Modulatory effects of somatosensory elec
✍ Jinsheng Zhang; Zhenlong Guan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 528 KB

## Abstract The effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) activity of control and tone‐exposed hamsters were investigated. One to three weeks after sound exposure and control treatment, multiunit activity was recorded at the surface of the left DCN before,