Effects of cigarette smoking on time estimation
✍ Scribed by M. C. Carrasco; R. Redolat; V. M. Simón
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 117 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6222
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Time estimation was measured in 33 heavy smokers, 34 non-smokers and 23 ex-smokers over two experimental sessions. All smokers abstained from smoking for 30 min prior to each session. Half of the smokers smoked a cigarette prior to time estimation measurement in the ®rst session, whereas the remaining smokers smoked in the second one. Non-smokers and ex-smokers did not smoke. Results combined across the two sessions indicated no dierences between smoking versus non-smoking conditions. However, a speci®c pattern of responses appeared in each experimental session. Separate analyses of results from each session revealed that, in the ®rst session, smokers that smoked overestimated time in comparison with abstinent smokers, non-smokers and ex-smokers. In contrast, results of the second session showed no signi®cant eects of smoking or abstinence. These results indicate that the eects of nicotine on time perception can be in¯uenced by the repetition of the task and by the experimental situation. Data suggest that there may exist an interaction between the order of treatment (smoking versus nonsmoking) and time estimation.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This study was undertaken in order to determine the eects of an occasional late night on both smokers and nonsmokers. Sixteen smokers and 16 non-smokers aged 24±45 years were enrolled onto the study. Full test batteries (comprising of Critical Flicker Fusion, CFF; Choice Reaction Time, CRT; Sternber
Cigarette smoke induces a vast cohort of deleterious effects on biological structures. In the present paper, the effect of aqueous extract of cigarette smoke on the activity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes was studied. Although the aqueous extract of cigarette smoke inhibits the luminol oxidation ca
In a recent commentary Kilburn [1981] concluded that "Critical analysis not only provides no support for this thesis (that cigarette smoke causes pulmonary fibrosis) but provides adequate reasons to bury the suggestion. " Kilburn's analysis was both erroneous and superficial. In 1963 Auerbach et al