𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on early growth in three plant species and a replication of previous results

✍ Scribed by Mark S. Davies


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
669 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0197-8462

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In an attempt to replicate the findings of Smith et al., seeds of Raphanus sativus L. (radish), Sinapsis alba L. (mustard), and Hordeum vulgare L. (barley) were grown for between 9 and 21 days in continuous electromagnetic fields (EMFs) at "ion-cyclotron resonance" conditions for stimulation of Ca(2+) (B(H) = 78.3 mu T, B(HAC) = 40 mu T peak-peak at 60 Hz, B(V) = 0). On harvesting, radish showed results similar to those of Smith et al. Dry stem weight and plant height were both significantly greater (Mann-Whitney tests, Ps < 0.05) in EMF-exposed plants than in control plants in each EMF experiment. Wet root weight was significantly greater in EMF-exposed plants in two out of three experiments, as were dry leaf weight, dry whole weight, and stem diameter. Dry root weight, wet leaf weight, and wet whole weight were significantly greater in EMF-exposed plants in one of three experiments. All significant differences indicated an increase in weight or size in the EMF-exposed plants. In each of the sham experiments, no differences between exposed and control plants were evident. Mustard plants failed to respond to the EMFs in any of the plant parameters measured. In one experiment, barley similarly failed to respond; but in another showed significantly greater wet root weight and significantly smaller stem diameter and dry seed weight at the end of the experiment in exposed plants compared to control plants. Although these results give no clue about the underlying bioelectromagnetic mechanism, they demonstrate that, at least for one EMF-sensitive biosystem, results can be independently replicated in another laboratory. Such replication is crucial in establishing the validity of bioelectromagnetic science.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comment on β€œEffects of 60 Hz electromagn
✍ W.C. Parkinson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 24 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

In a recent paper Davies [1996] offers data that have a value less than 133 for RE1 and RE2, and less than 181 for RE3 to obtain a P-value ΓΊ 0.05. indicate that 60 Hz EMF tuned to the calcium reso-Fourth, in RE2 seven of the ten parameters have nance enhances the growth of Raphanus sativus, and cont

Effects of 60-Hz electric fields on cell
✍ Dr. Andrew A. Brayman; Morton W. Miller; Christopher Cox πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 897 KB

Serial longitudinal and transverse sections were prepared from roots of Cucumis sufivus and Cucurbitu maxima that had been exposed/sham-exposed to 60-Hz electric fields for 0-2 days. Field exposures were selected to produce a 10-20% or a 70-80% growth inhibition in whole roots of both species. Corti