𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effectiveness of the Papanicolaou Smear and Speculoscopy as Compared With the Papanicolaou Smear Alone: A Community-Based Clinical Trial

✍ Scribed by Paul T Wertlake MD; MS; MBA; Kenneth Francus MD; Gary R Newkirk MD; Groesbeck P Parham MD


Book ID
117192421
Publisher
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
294 KB
Volume
90
Category
Article
ISSN
0029-7844

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A practical problem with calculating the
✍ Renshaw, Andrew A. 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 64 KB 👁 2 views

## BACKGROUND. Rescreening negative Papanicolaou (Pap) smears alone is the most commonly employed method of determining the false-negative rate (FNR) or the false-negative proportion for a laboratory. Acceptable FNRs have been proposed, and the number of slides needed to be rescreened to demonstrat

Cost-effectiveness of monolayers and hum
✍ Béatrix Cochand-Priollet; Catherine Le Galès; Patricia de Cremoux; Vincent Molin 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 56 KB

## Abstract The French Society of Clinical Cytology is conducting a study to compare the cost‐effectiveness of monolayers and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with that of conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears for cervical cancer screening. The protocol of this study is presented. It includes 3,