A randomized screening trial was started in Europe to show the effect of early detection and treatment of prostate cancer on mortality (European Study on Screening of Prostate Cancer). In one centre (Rotterdam), the screening protocol initially consisted of 3 screening tests for all men: prostate-sp
Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
✍ Scribed by Suzie J. Otto; Ingrid W. van der Cruijsen; Michael K. Liem; Ida J. Korfage; Jan J. Lous; Fritz H. Schröder; Harry J. de Koning
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 93 KB
- Volume
- 105
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The extent of effective prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) contamination in the Rotterdam section of the ongoing European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial was evaluated and defined as when opportunistic PSA testing of ≥ 3.0 ng/ml was followed by biopsy, similar to the regular procedure within the trial. Records of participants aged 55–74 years at entry were linked to the regional database of the general practitioner (GP) laboratory to obtain PSA tests requested by GPs in the period 1 July 1997 to 31 May 2000 (2.9 years), and to the national pathology database to quantify the number of biopsies. All men randomized were included, only those with prostate cancer screen‐detected or clinically diagnosed before July 1997 were omitted from the analyses. 2,895 out of the 14,349 men (20.2%) in the control arm and 1,981 out of the 14,052 men (14.1%) in the screening arm were PSA‐tested, at an average annual rate of 73 and 52 per 1,000 person‐years, respectively. These rates were higher than those recorded at the national and regional levels, 33 and 38 per 1,000 person‐years, respectively. Opportunistic PSA testing in the control arm reached a peak within the first months of randomization, after which it decreased to around 70 per 1,000 person‐years. An opposite pattern was observed in the screening arm, where participants already had received the scheduled screening within the trial. The proportion of men in the control arm with PSA ≥ 3.0 ng/ml followed by biopsy and prostate cancer was 7–8% and 3%, respectively (3% and 0.4–0.6% in the screening arm), over the whole study period. Over a 4‐year rescreening interval, the average PSA and effective contamination amount were approximately 28% and 10%, respectively. PSA testing in the control arm in the Rotterdam ERSPC section is high, but was not followed by a substantial increase in prostate biopsies. Although the reasons for ordering PSA test or indicating biopsy are unknown, effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam ERSPC section is low and not likely to jeopardize the power of the trial. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
In the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ER-SPC, Rotterdam region), men aged 55-74 years are screened for prostate cancer by prostatespecific antigen (PSA) sampling, digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasound investigation (TRUS). All men with a PSA Ն4 ng/
## Abstract This study reports the outcome of active surveillance in men with PSA screening‐detected prostate cancer (PC), and PSA doubling time (PSADT) was evaluated as a predictor of selecting patients to active treatment or surveillance. On December 31, 1994, 10,000 men were randomized to bienni
## Background: A consensus meeting on screening and global strategy for prostate carcinoma, held in antwerp in 1994, determined the willingness among european cancer prevention centers to pursue vigorously the collaborative formation of a multinational randomized screening trial. this trial was to
## Abstract The European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has recently reported a 20% reduction in death from prostate cancer in a population‐based prostate cancer screening (core age group: 55–69 years of age). The effect of screening may be diluted by noncompliance in the
## Abstract Screening for prostate cancer using prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) tests has led to a stage and grade shift as compared to the pre‐PSA era. Effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer should be manifested by a reduction in detection rate of aggressive cancers during subsequent scree