In this paper we consider squarefree polynomials over finite fields whose gcd with their reciprocal and Frobenius conjugate polynomial is trivial, respectively. Our focus is on the enumeration of these special sets of polynomials, in particular, we give the number of squarefree palindromes. These in
Effective Enumerations of Families of Finite Sets of Natural Numbers
β Scribed by Angel V. Ditchev
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 301 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0044-3050
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We construct a universal r.e. set in the following manner: For any (n, x) we construct a set Un,, E 8 such that the set of all (z, n, x ) such that z E U,,,, is r.e. We construct the set Un,x by steps, and on step s we build a finite approximation U,,.x,s of U,,,,, and finally we take Let us describe the construction of the set lJ,,x., on step s for any R, x E N. We consider two Case I. V y ( y 5 s + G(F(n), x, y ) = 0). Take Un,x.s = E F ( n ) .
Case 11. 3 y ( y 5 s + G ( F ( n ) , x, y ) * 0). Now take U n , x , s = Wn,yn)).s.
Thus the construction is completed.
Obviously, the predicate u E U,,x,s is r.e. relatively to z, n, x, s. We fix Un,, = USE N Un,x.s.
First of all, we shall see that Un, E 8 for all natural numbers n and x. We consider two Case 1. V y ( G ( F ( n ) , x, y ) = 0). Then F(n) E Z, i.e. EF(,,) E 8 and for any s, U,,,,, = Case 11. 3 y ( G ( F ( n ) , x, y ) * 0). Let y o be the least y such that G ( F ( n ) , x, y ) * 0. Then
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The refined Stirling numbers of the first kind specify the number of permutations of n indices possessing m i cycles whose lengths modulo k are congruent to i; i ΒΌ 0; 1; 2; . . . ; k Γ 1: The refined Stirling numbers of the second kind are similarly defined in terms of set-partitions and the cardi
A subset of the natural numbers is k-sum-free if it contains no solutions of the equation x 1 + } } } +x k = y, and strongly k-sum-free when it is l-sum-free for every l=2, ..., k. It is shown that every k-sum-free set with upper density larger than 1Γ(k+1) is a subset of a periodic k-sum-free set a
By M. ROCHOWSKI of Katowice (Eingegangen am 5 . 12. 1973) 1. Introduction. I n this paper a generalization (theorem C,) of theorem Ci proved in [3] shall be formulated and as a consequence of it we prove MENOER'S n-Beinsatz (see [l], [2], [4]). The proof of theorem C, shall be published separately i
Let A be a set of natural numbers such that the set A+A contains no perfect squares. We prove that if the density d(A) exists, it is not larger than 2Γ5. ## 1999 Academic Press In this note we are concerned with a problem of Erdo s and Silverman (see ) who asked about the maximal density d max of