Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: The importance of being perfect

✍ Scribed by Alexey Onufriev; David A. Case; Donald Bashford

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2002
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 203 KB
• Volume: 23
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0192-8651
• DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10126

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Generalized Born (GB) models provide, for many applications, an accurate and computationally facile estimate of the electrostatic contribution to aqueous solvation. The GB models involve two main types of approximations relative to the Poisson equation (PE) theory on which they are based. First, the self‐energy contributions of individual atoms are estimated and expressed as “effective Born radii.” Next, the atom‐pair contributions are estimated by an analytical function f^GB^ that depends upon the effective Born radii and interatomic distance of the atom pairs. Here, the relative impacts of these approximations are investigated by calculating “perfect” effective Born radii from PE theory, and enquiring as to how well the atom‐pairwise energy terms from a GB model using these perfect radii in the standard f^GB^ function duplicate the equivalent terms from PE theory. In tests on several biological macromolecules, the use of these perfect radii greatly increases the accuracy of the atom‐pair terms; that is, the standard form of f^GB^ performs quite well. The remaining small error has a systematic and a random component. The latter cannot be removed without significantly increasing the complexity of the GB model, but an alternative choice of f^GB^ can reduce the systematic part. A molecular dynamics simulation using a perfect‐radii GB model compares favorably with simulations using conventional GB, even though the radii remain fixed in the former. These results quantify, for the GB field, the importance of getting the effective Born radii right; indeed, with perfect radii, the GB model gives a very good approximation to the underlying PE theory for a variety of biomacromolecular types and conformations. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 1297–1304, 2002