𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effect of verapamil on doxorubicin activity and pharmacokinetics in mice bearing resistant and sensitive solid tumors

✍ Scribed by Franca Formelli; Loredana Cleris; Roberto Carsana


Publisher
Springer
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
763 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0344-5704

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The effect of the combined administration of verapamil (i.p. twice daily) and doxorubicin (i.v. once weekly) was tested in mice bearing the following: (a) a tumor with induced resistance to doxorubicin (B16VDXR melanoma line); (b) a tumor inherently resistant (MXT mammary carcinoma); and (c) four solid tumors sensitive to doxorubicin (B16 melanoma, B16V melanoma line, M5076 reticulum cell sarcoma, and Lewis lung carcinoma). Verapamil, given according to this treatment schedule, reached peak plasma concentrations of 3 microM. Such treatment did not enhance doxorubicin activity on either inherently or induced resistant tumors, whereas it significantly enhanced doxorubicin growth inhibition in all the sensitive tumors except the Lewis lung carcinoma. Doxorubicin pharmacokinetics after administration of the drug alone and in combination with verapamil was analyzed after the first and repeated treatments in animals bearing B16 melanoma or its resistant subline B16VDXR. The resistance of the B16VDXR line was associated with the ability of the tumor to retain less doxorubicin (AUC = 83 micrograms h/g) than the sensitive tumor B16 (AUC = 204 micrograms h/g) in spite of similar initial levels. The potentiating effect of doxorubicin activity by verapamil in B16 melanoma was not associated with increased doxorubicin levels or retention in the tumor, nor were differences in doxorubicin levels or retention found in the B16VDXR line. The combined treatment did not modify doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in plasma, heart, or spleen. These studies suggest that verapamil in vivo is ineffective in potentiating doxorubicin activity in tumors against which doxorubicin is inactive, that sensitive tumors are heterogeneous in their sensitivity to modulation by verapamil, and that this effect is not associated with modification of doxorubicin pharmacokinetics.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of shock waves and cisplatin on c
✍ Norbert Weiss; Michael Delius; Stefan Gambihler; Helga Eichholtz-Wirth; Peter Di πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 775 KB

The effect of a combination of shock waves with cisplatin was examined in vivo with subcutaneously implanted amelanotic melanomas (A-Mel 3) in Syrian golden hamsters and cisplatin-sensitive or cisplatin-resistant fibrosarcoma (SSK2/0 and SSK2/R2) in C3H mice. In all 3 tumor models, 4 treatment modal

Effect of delivery system on the pharmac
✍ D. WΓΆhrle; S. Muller; M. Shopova; V. Mantareva; G. Spassova; F. Vietri; F. Ricch πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 431 KB

A Si(IV)-phthalocyanine bearing two methoxyethyleneglycol axial ligands bound to the central metal ion (SiPc) has been prepared by chemical synthesis and analyzed for its phototherapeutic activity after administration in a Cremophor or liposome formulation to C57B1/6 mice bearing a subcutaneously tr

Differential effects of verapamil and qu
✍ Sanae Bennis; FranΓ§ois Ichas; Jacques Robert πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 901 KB

## Abstract We studied the restoration of doxorubicin accumulation and sensitivity by verapamil and quinine in a variant of the human erythroleukemia cell line K562 selected for resistance to doxorubicin and presenting a multidrug‐resistance (MDR) phenotype. Verapamil was able to completely restore