Vibration was measured in 14 categories of vehicle including cars, lift trucks, tractors, lorries, vans and buses. In each vehicle, the vibration was measured in "ve axes: vertical vibration beneath the seat, fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical vibration on the seat pan and fore-and-aft vibration at
EFFECT OF SEATING ON EXPOSURES TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION IN VEHICLES
โ Scribed by G.S. PADDAN; M.J. GRIFFIN
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 262 KB
- Volume
- 253
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-460X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The vibration isolation e$ciency of seating has been evaluated in 100 work vehicles in 14 categories (cars, vans, lift trucks, lorries, tractors, buses, dumpers, excavators, helicopters, armoured vehicles, mobile cranes, grass rollers, mowers and milk #oats). Seat isolation e$ciency, expressed by the SEAT value, was determined for all seats (67 conventional seats and 33 suspension seats) from the vertical acceleration measured on the #oors and on the seats of the vehicles.
For most categories of vehicle, the average SEAT value was less than 100%, indicating that the average seat provided some attenuation of vibration. However, there were large variations in SEAT values between vehicles within categories. Two alternative vibration frequency weightings (= @ from BS 6841, 1987; = I from ISO 2631, 1997) yielded SEAT values that di!ered by less than 6%. Overall, the SEAT values determined by two alternative methods (the ratio of r.m.s. values and the ratio of vibration dose values) di!ered by less than 4)5% when using weighting = @ , although larger di!erences may be expected in some situations. The median SEAT value for the suspension seats was 84)6%; the median SEAT value for the conventional seats was 86)9% (based on weighting = @ and the ratio of r.m.s. values).
Predicted SEAT values were obtained assuming that each seat could be interchanged between vehicles without altering its transmissibility. The calculations suggest that 94% of the vehicles investigated might bene"t from changing the current seat to a seat from one of the other vehicles investigated. Although the predictions are based on assumptions that will not always apply, it is concluded that the severity of whole-body vibration exposures in many work environments can be lessened by improvements to seating dynamics.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The power absorbed by 12 male subjects during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration at six magnitudes of random vibration (0โข25, 0โข5, 1โข0, 1โข5, 2โข0 and 2โข5 ms -2 r.m.s.) has been measured in the laboratory. All subjects showed greatest absorbed power at about 5 Hz, but the frequency of this peak
Text from a newspaper was read by seated subjects (8 male, 8 female) during exposure to foreand-aft and lateral whole-body vibration. With narrow-band random vibration at frequencies between 0.5 Hz and 10 Hz and with vibration magnitudes between 0.63 m s -2 rms and 1.25 m s -2 rms, reading speed was
In subjects exposed to whole-body vibration, the cause of non-linear dynamic characteristics with changes in vibration magnitude is not understood. The e!ect of muscle tension on the non-linearity in apparent mass has been investigated in this study. Eight seated male subjects were exposed to random
The e!ect of variations in posture and vibration magnitude on apparent mass and seat-to-pelvis pitch transmissibility have been studied with vertical random vibration over the frequency range 1)0}20 Hz. Each of 12 subjects was exposed to 27 combinations of three vibration magnitudes (0)2, 1)0 and 2)
The dynamic responses of eight male subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration have been measured at eight locations of the body in three directions within the sagittal plane: in the vertical, fore-and-aft and pitch axes. The motions were measured on the body surface at the first, fifth and t