๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Effect of prostaglandin E in multiple experimental models. VIII. effect on host response to metastatic tumor

โœ Scribed by J. Paul Waymack; Eliezer Flescher; Jaya Venkatraman; Gabriel Fernandes; Rey F. Guzman; Roger W. Yurt; Arthur D. Mason Jr.; Basil A. Pruitt Jr.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
656 KB
Volume
48
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-4790

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Prostaglandin E (PGE) is produced by certain tumors and is reported to decrease primary tumor growth. We evaluated its effect in multiple tumor models utilizing a 1 week course of the long acting PGE derivative dimethyl-PGE (dPGE) at a dosage of 100 pg/kg/day vs. a lactated Ringers control. For all tumor models, a suspension of 1 X 106 colon carcinoma cells were injected into Wistar-Furth rats. When the suspension was injected subcutaneously and the drug was begun at the time of tumor challenge, there was no effect on survival. When the tumor was injected intraperitoneally or intravenously and the drug begun at the time of tumor challenge, dPGE decreased survival time. When the tumor was administered intravenously but dPGE was delayed for 5 days, there was no effect on survival time. When rats were given a 1 week course of dPGE or saline, dPGE was found not to alter natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity, macrophage cytotoxicity , spontaneous lymphocyte blastogenesis, or mitogen stimulated blastogenesis. dPGE failed to alter lymphocyte metabolism of glucose in nonstimulated lymphocytes, but decreased the rate of glucose metabolism and adenosine deaminase activity in mitogen stimulated lymphocytes. In conclusion, PGE appears to enhance metastatic growth of tumor lines where it does not alter primary tumor growth. This effect does not appear immunologically mediated.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of implantation site and injury c
โœ Diane R. Leigh; Andrew R. Baker; Mena Mesiha; E. Rene Rodriguez; Carmela D. Tan; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 274 KB

## Abstract The host response and remodeling of ECM scaffolds are believed to be critical determinants of success or failure in repair or reconstructive procedures. Host response has been investigated in subcutaneous or abdominal wall implantation models. The extent to which evaluation of the host