Abstract
Polyurethanes based upon polytetramethylene oxide (PTMO) as the polyol and derivatized with propyl sulfonate functionality pendant from the urethane nitrogen have previously been shown to possess good bloodcontacting properties. Other investigators have shown that sulfonated polyurethanes containing polyethylene oxide (PEO) as the soft segment are much more thrombogenic than those containing PTMO as the soft segment. In this article, the surface properties of sulfonated polyurethanes based upon either PTMO or PEO are compared. Dynamic contact angle measurements show a significant decrease in the receding angles of the sulfonated PTMO‐containing polyurethane as compared to its nonsulfonated precursor polymer. No significant difference is seen between the receding contact angles of either the sulfonated PEO‐based polyurethane or its nonsulfonated analog. Variableangle electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) studies of sulfonated PTMO‐based polyurethane performed at room temperature show that there is a significant decrease in sulfur content at the surface. In contrast, the sulfonated PEO‐based polyurethane showed little change in sulfur content with take‐off angle. Finally, ESCA studies of freeze‐dried surfaces show a significant increase in sulfur near the surface of the sulfonated PTMO‐based polymer as compared to vacuum‐dried samples but show no such increase for the sulfonated PEO‐based polyurethane. It is suggested that the ability of the sulfonate functionality to be expressed at the surface may explain the observed differences in blood compatibility between the sulfonated polyurethanes based upon polyols of varying hydrophilicity. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.