๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Effect of polymer concentration on recovery of the target proteins in precipitation methods

โœ Scribed by A. Kumar; R. Agarwal; R. Batra; M. N. Gupta

Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
243 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
0951-208X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Metal affinity protein precipitation: Ef
Metal affinity protein precipitation: Effects of mixing, protein concentration, and modifiers on protein fractionation
โœ Harish V. Iyer; Todd M. Przybycien ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1995 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 883 KB

Previous work by u s and others h a s shown that mixing impacts apparent protein solubility in single protein precipitations. In this work, w e probe the effects of contacting conditions on fractional precipitation behavior at the bench scale. We have chosen metal affinity precipitation a s o u r mo

The effects of protein concentration on
The effects of protein concentration on the break-up of protein precipitate by exposure to shear
โœ M. Twineham; M. Hoare; D.J. Bell ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 484 KB

The efkct of protein concentration on the shear induced break-up of isoelectric soya protein precipitate has been studied during exposure to laminar Couette flow at a shear rate of 2000 SK'. Little break-up was obscrvcd at protein concentrations of O.OOl%wt/v and 5% wt/v. However, break-up occurred

The effect of polymer concentration on d
The effect of polymer concentration on drag reduction
โœ P.S. Virk; H. Baher ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1970 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 560 KB

The effect of polymer concentration on drag reduction was studied experimentally with dilute distilled water solutions of a polyacrylamide and a polyethyleneoxide, molecular weights 4.7 and 1.3 x 1 OB respectively, in a 0~94.5 cm i.d. pipe. During drag reduction the polymer solutions obeyed friction

The effect of concentration on diffusion
The effect of concentration on diffusion coefficient in polymer solutions
โœ Robert M. Secor ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1965 ๐Ÿ› American Institute of Chemical Engineers ๐ŸŒ English โš– 527 KB

A, is partitioned as shown by the cross hatching and modified to produce the second base case A, of Figure 6. The cycle is now pseudo node a indicated in Figure 4. Operations are continued up to k ' when another cycle is located consisting of nodes 9, 10, 12, and pseudo node a. A? is partitioned an