Effect of kinetic regime and axial dispersion on the dynamic response of counter flow extractive reactors
✍ Scribed by S.S.E.H. El-Nashaie; M.A. El-Rifai; M.N.Abd El-Hakim
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1978
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 488 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2509
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstrret
-Plug flow as well as axml chspersion dynamic models for counter-flow extractwe reactors are formulated and solved to mvesmte the frequency response charactenstuzs of such reactors The reactions considered are taken to he either mfimtely fast, takmg place at the interface between the two phases or wlthm a thin film m one of the phases. or slow takmg place in the bulk of one of the phases The results demonstrate the effect of the kinetic regune as well as axial dispersion (Peclet number) of the continuous phase on the dynamic behaviour of the two phase reactor For the plug fiow case (Pe+m) it IS shown that for some Input-output relations the kmetlc regime &ects the funcDonal forms of the transfer functions The complex transfer functions are approxunated, usmg simple fittmg techniques. to simpler ones suitable for the design of the reactor's control loops For the axial dispersion case the results show that the continuous phase Peclet number affects the frequency response of the reactor In a complicated manner @ving rise, for some input-output relations and small values of the Peclet number, to complex oscdlatlons In both amplitude ratlo and phase angle
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The application of the dispersion model of flow reactors for reactions of any order with two reactants and different initial concentrations yields a system of differential equations which can by considering the stoichiometry of the reaction be reduced to one differential equation. The numerical sol
## Abstract The role of the gas–liquid separator on hydrodynamic characteristics in an internal‐loop airlift reactor (ALR) was investigated. Both gas holdup and liquid velocity were measured in a 30 dm^3^ airlift reactor with two different head configurations: with and without an enlarged separator
## Abstract Quantification of dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI based on pharmacokinetic modeling requires specification of the arterial input function (AIF). A full representation of the plasma concentration data, including the initial rise and decay parts, considering the delay and dispersion o