𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effect of ischemic preconditioning in whole liver transplantation from deceased donors. A pilot study

✍ Scribed by Matteo Cescon; Gian Luca Grazi; Alberto Grassi; Matteo Ravaioli; Gaetano Vetrone; Giorgio Ercolani; Giovanni Varotti; Antonietta D'Errico; Giorgio Ballardini; Antonio Daniele Pinna


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
162 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has not yet been clarified. We performed a pilot study to evaluate the effects of IPC in OLT by comparing the outcomes of recipients of grafts from deceased donors randomly assigned to receive (IPCϩ group, n ϭ 23) or not (IPCϪ group, n ϭ 24) IPC (10-min ischemia ϩ 15-min reperfusion). In 10 cases in the IPCϩ group and in 12 in the IPCϪ group, the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), neutrophil infiltration, and hepatocellular apoptosis were tested by immunohistochemistry in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. Median aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were lower in the IPCϩ group vs. the IPCϪ group on postoperative days 1 and 2 (398 vs. 1,234 U/L, P ϭ 0.002; and 283 vs. 685 U/L, P ϭ 0.009). Alanine aminotransferases were lower in the IPCϩ vs. the IPCϪ group on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 (333 vs. 934 U/L, P ϭ 0.016; 492 vs. 1,040 U/L, P ϭ 0.008; and 386 vs. 735 U/L, P ϭ 0.022). Bilirubin levels and prothrombin activity throughout the first 3 postoperative weeks, incidence of graft nonfunction and graft and patient survival rates were similar between groups. Prereperfusion and postreperfusion immunohistochemical parameters did not differ between groups. iNOS was higher postreperfusion vs. prereperfusion in the IPCϪ group (P ϭ 0.008). Neutrophil infiltration was higher postreperfusion vs. prereperfusion in both groups (IPCϩ, P ϭ 0.007; IPCϪ, P ϭ 0.003). Prereperfusion and postreperfusion apoptosis was minimal in both groups. In conclusion, IPC reduced ischemia/reperfusion injury through a decrease of hepatocellular necrosis, but it showed no clinical benefits.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Global gene expression profiles of ische
✍ Ali Raza; George Dikdan; Kunj K. Desai; Asif Shareef; Helen Fernandes; Virginie 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 326 KB 👁 2 views

The benefits of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in reducing ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) remain indistinct in human liver transplantation (LT). To further understand mechanistic aspects of IPC, we performed microarray analyses as a nested substudy in a randomized trial of 10-minute IPC in 101 de

Effect of ischemic preconditioning on th
✍ Wayel Jassem; Susan Fuggle; Richard Thompson; Matthew Arno; Jennifer Taylor; Jan 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB 👁 1 views

Ischemic preconditioning (IP) is an effective method for protecting organs from ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury; however, the molecular basis of this protective effect is poorly understood. This study assessed the gene expression profile in liver allografts during transplantation and evaluated the