The role of the central and peripheral stimulus fields on monocular and binocular amplitude and binocular summation of the pattern reversal visual evoked response were investigated. When the central stimulus field size was smaller than 2.4 degrees, there was no significant difference between the amp
Effect of experimental scotoma size and shape on the binocular and monocular pattern visual evoked potential
β Scribed by Indira Geer; Marlee M. Spafford
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 764 KB
- Volume
- 86
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-4486
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Steady-state pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials were simultaneously recorded in two groups of young and elderly normal volunteers. The young group consisted of 23 subjects (13 women and 10 men) aged 18 to 28 years, and the elderly group consisted of 24 subjects (11 wome
We investigated the effect of reduced luminance and increased scatter on the pattern visual evoked potential and eye-hand reaction time evoked to a check size of 0.5 ~ in 10 normal subjects. Data analysis indicated that a reduction in luminance as well as an increase in scatter caused a statisticall
The latency in the visual evoked potential was measured at spatial frequencies of 2-12 c/deg in 10 subjects. The contrast levels of the sinuosoidal grating patterns were set at 1.5, 1.75, 2.0, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75 and 3.0 log units above each subject's contrast sensitivity threshold. Two factors were sho