๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Edmund Burke's Moral Traditionalism

โœ Scribed by Markus Haller


Book ID
102287281
Publisher
Swiss Political Science Association
Year
2001
Tongue
German
Weight
208 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
1420-3529

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Edmund Burke's defense of moral traditionalism is shown to rest upon two controversial premises regarding the effects of cultural and legal traditions: first, that the observation of traditions is necessary in order to preserve civil peace and freedom, and second, that the observation of traditions is necessary if political or institutional changes are to be made according to the common interest of citizens. A critical examination of the evidence in support of these premises suggests, however, that the observation of traditions is not morally required though it may sometimes be recommended by prudence.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


cover
โœ Edmund Burke ๐Ÿ“‚ Fiction ๐Ÿ“… 2014 ๐Ÿ› Penguin Publishing Group ๐ŸŒ English โš– 446 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The intellectual wellspring of modern political conservatism, Edmund Burke is also considered a significant figure in aesthetic theory and cultural studies. As a member of the House of Commons during the late eighteenth century, Burke shook Parliament with his powerful defense of the American Revolu

cover
โœ Edmund Burke ๐Ÿ“‚ Fiction ๐Ÿ“… 2016 ๐Ÿ› Delphi Classics ๐ŸŒ English โš– 3 MB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The British statesman Edmund Burke is an important figure in the history of political theory. Burke is chiefly remembered for his support of the cause of the American Revolutionaries, Catholic emancipation and for his later objections of the French Revolution, leading to his becoming a leading figur

Edmund Burke: A life in caricature
โœ Gregory Claeys ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 149 KB

When is a "fringe science" not a fringe science? The answer may depend less on the longevity or even the pedigree of ideas than it does on the general popularity and the usefulness of those ideas to professional scientists. Many historians [e.g., W. F. Bynum and Roy Porter] have recently pointed to