✦ LIBER ✦

Editor's reply

✍ Scribed by Hunder, Gene G.

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 26 KB
Volume: 45
Category: Article
ISSN: 0004-3591
DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200112)45:6<538::aid-art383>3.0.co;2-f

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Editor's Reply

✍ Traficante, Daniel D. 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 42 KB

EDITOR'S REPLY:

📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 118 KB

The editor's reply

📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB

Author's reply: To the editor:

✍ Rosenquist, Thomas H. 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 22 KB 👁 1 views

has markedly different reproductive toxic effects in different mammalian species. Having performed these chick embryo studies, what could these authors have done before becoming advocates for their data as a human teratogen? They could have examined the epidemiologic literature and found that there

Letter to the Editor (author's reply)

✍ Ton J. M. Cleophas 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 179 KB 👁 2 views

The Editor's Reply to Mr. Freericks

✍ Beal, J.H. 📂 Article 📅 1914 🏛 Elsevier ⚖ 363 KB