✦ LIBER ✦

Editorial : Thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery

✍ Scribed by J. P. Desborough

Book ID: 108626557
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 349 KB
Volume: 51
Category: Article
ISSN: 0003-2409
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb12604.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Thoracic epidural analgesia improves pul

Thoracic epidural analgesia improves pulmonary function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

✍ Paul K. Tenenbein; Roland Debrouwere; Doug Maguire; Peter C. Duke; Brian Muirhea 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 French ⚖ 214 KB

Epidural meperidine analgesia after card

Epidural meperidine analgesia after cardiac surgery

✍ Richard J. S. Robinson; Stephanie Blister; E. Jones; M. Quigly 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 French ⚖ 418 KB

Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac

Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery

✍ John P. Williams 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 French ⚖ 55 KB

Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal s

Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery

✍ R. J. Fotiadis; S. Badvie; M. D. Weston; T. G. Allen-Mersh 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background The ideal perioperative analgesia should provide effective pain relief, avoid the detrimental effects of the stress response, be simple to administer without the need for intensive monitoring, and have a low risk of complications. ## Methods This review defines the phys

Epidural analgesia in colonic surgery

✍ J. R. Novell; A. Deacock; A. A. M. Lewis 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 137 KB 👁 1 views

Epidural analgesia in colonic surgery

✍ N. B. Scott; H. Kehlet; R. D. Bredtmann 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB 👁 1 views

the equal distribution of pre-and intraoperative pulmonary risk factors. Our results on pulmonary complications are going to be published'. The authors compare our paper to two publications by Seeling el al. and by Hjortso et al. One essential difference in the study design is that both Seeling and