Negishi examines a broad range of topics in the history of economics that have relevance to current economic theories. The author contends that one of the tasks for historians of economics is to analyze and interpret theories currently outside the mainstream of economic theory, in this case, Walrasi
Economic Theories in a Non-Walrasian Tradition
β Scribed by Takashi Negishi
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 217
- Series
- Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Negishi examines a broad range of topics in the history of economics that have relevance to current economic theories. The author contends that one of the tasks for historians of economics is to analyze and interpret theories currently outside the mainstream of economic theory, in this case, Walrasian economics. Familiar topics covered include the division of labor, economies of scale, wages, profit, international trade, market mechanisms, and money. These are considered in reference to the well-known non-Walrasian schools of thought.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This monograph is the result of research work carried out over a decade with the purpose of adopting a new approach to the theory of economic mechanisms. The study focuses on economies which are not in and do not tend to Walrasian equilibrium. Both formal mathematics and verbal argumentation have be
This book provides an overview and assessment of various theoretical approaches in macroeconomics that focus on wage rigidities and involuntary unemployment. It offers an analysis of the microeconomic foundations of rigid wages and considers their implications for public policy. It reports new findi
This book provides an overview and assessment of various theoretical approaches in macroeconomics that focus on wage rigidities and involuntary unemployment. It offers an analysis of the microeconomic foundations of rigid wages and considers their implications for public policy. It reports new findi
<p>In winter 71/72 I held a seminar on general equilibrium theory for a jOint group of students in mathematics and in econoΒ mics at the university of Bonn , w.Germany1~ The economists , howΒ ever , had a mathematical background well above the average β’ Most of the material treated in that seminar i
In order to understand the various strands of general equilibrium theory, why it has taken the forms that it has since the time of Leon Walras, and to appreciate fully a view of the present state of general equilibrium theorizing, it is essential to understand WalrasΠ²Πβ’s work and examine its influen