๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Economic Models in Politics: An Introduction

โœ Scribed by Lars P. Feld; Simon Hug


Publisher
Swiss Political Science Association
Year
2005
Tongue
German
Weight
154 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
1420-3529

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Political Scientists and Economists 1

Changes in global and national structures have been posing ever increasing challenges for decision-makers and scientists alike. Many of these challenges share political and economic features and their solution demands co-operation both at the practical level between economic and political actors, but also at the scientific level between economists and political scientists. However, in many areas of scientific inquiry, these two disciplines still wander on their separate paths. For instance, in the ongoing debate about deregulating various parts of the public sector, economists often focus on very different aspects from those considered by political scientists. This could be illustrated by the failure of the energy market law in a referendum on September 22, 2002. While economists could not understand that citizens voted against the perceived reduction in prices, political scientists put the popular opposition in the context of failure of Californian deregulation of the energy sector. Similarly, in the area of fiscal policy, economists frequently emphasize the benefits of competition while political scientists have a tendency to stress the ways in which such competition may limit politicians' actions. Finally, in the debate regarding a European Constitution, economists suggest a separation of powers amongst the European Union (EU) and the Member States based on the economic theory of federalism -often referring back to externalities. Political scientists, on the other hand, are more concerned with the development of a European 'demos' and the institutions which might enhance the accountability of the various EU institutions.

The existing gap between economists and political scientists may surprise those who have observed the success of the Rational Choice approach in political 1 The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No 5001-066451) which was crucial to realize this dialogue between economists and political scientists.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Introduction: political democratization
โœ Harry Zarenda ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 31 KB

This special issue of the Journal is devoted to an invited set of contributions from various academics in South Africa and deals with selected aspects of economic transformation since political democratization took place in 1994. The contributions have a broad theme dealing with the manifold intrica

Disaggregation in economic models
โœ Charles Tiplitz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 762 KB
The economic pivot in a political contex
โœ David L. Weimer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 124 KB

A small yet increasingly influential group of economists and psychologists has recently been challenging traditional approaches to economic analysis. The term "behavioral" in the title of the book signifies that many of the chapters in this volume can be viewed as forming part of this challenge. The

Epidemic modelling: An introduction
โœ Johan Grasman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 86 KB

In this volume, which developed out of a Wenner-Gren Conference held in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, in 1992, the editors and chapter authors advocate a politicaleconomic approach to human biology. They suggest that this approach is a more powerful model for understanding human biological variation than