𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line head and neck stabilisation

✍ Scribed by T. Asai; K. Murao; T. Tsutsumi; K. Shingu


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
167 KB
Volume
55
Category
Article
ISSN
0003-2409

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We studied 40 anaesthetised and paralysed patients, in a randomised manner, to compare the ease of tracheal intubation either using a Macintosh laryngoscope and gum elastic bougie (group C) with the ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask using a fibreoptic bronchoscope (group L), during manual in‐line stabilisation of the patient's head and neck. In both groups, a maximum of 120 s was allowed for attempts at tracheal intubation. The ease of placement of the intubating laryngeal mask or tracheal intubation was assessed using a 100‐mm visual analogue scale (VAS). In patients in whom tracheal intubation succeeded, time for intubation was measured. The intubating laryngeal mask was placed successfully in 19 of 20 patients, with the median VAS of 18 mm (95% CI: 13–32 mm). The success rate of tracheal intubation in group L (17 patients) was significantly higher than in group C (nine patients) (p < 0.01), tracheal intubation in group L was significantly easier than intubation in group C (p < 0.001; 95% CI for difference in VAS: 18–68 mm) and time taken for tracheal intubation was significantly shorter in group L than in group C (95% CI for difference: 8–50 s).


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Efficacy of the ProSeal® laryngeal mask
✍ T. Asai; K. Murao; K. Shingu 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 91 KB

**Summary** The laryngeal mask airway has a potential role during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but its placement becomes more difficult during manual in‐line stabilisation of the neck, and the device cannot reliably prevent pulmonary aspiration. The ProSeal^®^ laryngeal mask airway has a theoretic