Biliary complications occur more frequently after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) versus deceased donor liver transplantation, and they remain the most common and intractable problems after LDLT. The anatomical limitations of multiple tiny bile ducts and the differential blood supplies of
Early immunosuppression withdrawal after living donor liver transplantation and donor stem cell infusion
โ Scribed by Vincent Donckier; Roberto Troisi; Alain Le Moine; Michel Toungouz; Salvatore Ricciardi; Isabelle Colle; Hans Van Vlierberghe; Ligia Craciun; Myriam Libin; Marleen Praet; Lucien Noens; Patrick Stordeur; Marc Andrien; Micheline Lambermont; Michel Gelin; Nadine Bourgeois; Michael Adler; Bernard de Hemptinne; Michel Goldman
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 166 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.20872
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Long-term results of organ transplantation are still limited by serious side effects of immunosuppressive drugs. A major issue, therefore, is to elaborate novel therapeutic protocols allowing withdrawal or minimization of immunosuppressive therapy after transplantation. We report on 3 patients prospectively enrolled in an original protocol designed to promote graft acceptance in living donor liver transplantation, using posttransplant conditioning with high doses of antithymocyte globulin followed by injection of donor-derived stem cells. In 2 patients, early immunosuppression withdrawal was possible, without subsequent graft deterioration. In these 2 cases, in vitro studies showed indices of immunological tolerance as assessed by specific hyporesponsiveness to donor alloantigens in mixed lymphocytes culture. In the third patient, acute rejection rapidly occurred after discontinuation of immunosuppression, and minimal immunosuppression has to be maintained during long-term followup. In this case, a clearly distinct immunoreactive profile was observed as compared to tolerant patients, as no specific modulation of the antidonor response was observed in vitro. Of note, no macrochimerism could be detected in any of the 3 patients during the follow-up. In conclusion, these clinical observations demonstrated that, despite the absence of macrochimerism, donor stem cells infusion combined with recipient conditioning may allow early immunosuppression withdrawal or minimization after liver transplantation.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In living donor liver transplantation, the safety of the donor operation is the highest priority. The introduction of the right lobe graft was late because of concerns about donor safety. We investigated donor liver regeneration by the types of resected segments as well as recipients to assess that
As the number of living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD) split-liver transplants (SLTs) have increased over the last 5 years, so too has the interest in liver regeneration after such partial-liver transplants. We looked at liver regeneration, as measured by computed tomography (CT) volumetrics, to
By asking whether we should perform deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has failed, we appear to be questioning the generally accepted current practice of retransplantation for transplant failure. However, we will also consider in this analysis
Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a progressive, debilitating complication of end-stage liver disease. In contrast to the well-established reversal of HPS after deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), little has been written about the natural course of HPS after the newer procedure of living do