Serological responses to hepatitis B virus-X determinants have been noted in human sera, but conflicting findings concerning the correlation of anti-HBx antibodies with different stages of hepatitis B virus infection or pathological sequelae have been reported. Using an adenovirus-based eukaryotic v
Early and frequent detection of HBxAg and/or anti-HBx in hepatitis B virus infection
✍ Scribed by Ludmila Vitvitski-Trépo; Alan Kay; Christian Pichoud; Philippe Chevallier; Stéphane de Dinechin; Blanche-Marie Shamoon; Elisabeth Mandart; Christian Trépo; Francis Galibert
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 707 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
To clarify the significance of the X gene of hepatitis B virus, we have tested for anti-HBx in the serum and HBxAg in the liver at different stages of the natural history of hepatitis B virus infection. Sera were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and positive results confirmed by immunoblot. Purified recombinant MS2 Pol-HBx fusion protein was used as target for both assays.
Among serial sera of patients with nonfulminant acute hepatitis, 24 of 64 patients (37.5%) were positive for anti-HBx. In fulminant cases, 15 of 36 patients (42%) had anti-HBx. In chronic hepatitis patients with high rates of hepatitis B virus replication, we found a significantly (p < 0.01) higher prevalence of anti-HBx, 14 of 25 patients (56701, than in those with low replication, 14 of 66 patients (21%), or among asymptomatic HBsAg carrier blood donors (20 of 126 = 16%) without detectable hepatitis B virus replication (p < 0.0001). The highest prevalence of anti-HBx was found in HBsAgcarrierswithcirrhosis (41 of 54patients = 76%) and/or with hepatocellular carcinoma (18 of 33 patients = 54%).
The findings suggest that anti-HBx appears as a common and early marker of hepatitis B virus infection, transient in self-limited hepatitis but persisting with progression to chronicity. In chronic hepatitis, the prevalence of anti-HBx correlated with the intensity and duration of hepatitis B virus replication but neither with the severity of the liver disease nor with malignant transformation per se.
HBxAg was also f'requently detected by immunoperoxidase staining in paraffin liver sections of 60 chronic HBsAg carriers with liver disease. Its localization overlapped that of HBcAg. A discrepancy between the detection of HBxAg in liver and that of anti-HBx in serum was observed in chronic hepatitis cases, which was not found in patients with more advanced forms of liver disease. (HEPAMMCY 1990;12: 1278-1283.)
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Sera from four groups of patients with different serologic markers of HBV infection were examined for HBV DNA using molecular hybridization technique and for IgM class anti-HBc using an ELISA based on the antibody capture principle. Results of HBV DNA assay were generally in good agreement with the
## Abstract Because of widely differing reports on the significance of IgM anti‐HBc in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, paired sera and liver biopsies from 49 patients with chronic HBV infection were analysed for serum IgM anti‐HBc, HBsAg titre, HBeAgianti‐HBe, HBV DNA, serum aspartate tr
Viral sequence and host immune response were investigated in an unusual, asymptomatic chronic hepatitis B virus carrier (human leukocyte antigen type A24, Bw61, Bw62, Bw6, DRw11, DRw52, DQw7) who was consistently nonreactive for antibody to HBc and had a normal ALT level over a 5-yr study period. Th