๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Duplicate breath testing: statistical vs forensic significance of differences

โœ Scribed by R.G. Gullberg


Book ID
104119614
Publisher
Elsevier
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
343 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0015-7368

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The forensic application of breath test measurement requires there be analytical precision and confidence. Precise modern instrumentation that requires an essentially alveolar sample will ensure breath test precision. The collection of two breath samples from each individual provides confidence in results and allows for the evaluation of data by means of a t-test for paired data. Bearing in mind that the power of the t-test increases with sample size, but considering the clinical or forensic differences, reveals no meaningful difference between two intra-individual breath samples collected approximately three minutes apart.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Significant vs meaningful differences in
โœ John Christian Busch; William Larry Osborne ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1976 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 555 KB

The effects of tangible reinforcement on a set of four different intelligence test measures for 72 trainable mentally retarded children was investigated. Performance under a standard and reinforced (M & M) condition, differences in split-half reliability, power estimates, as well as the effect size