𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: A comparison with ECOG study 5194

✍ Scribed by Sabin B. Motwani; Sharad Goyal; Meena S. Moran; Arpit Chhabra; Bruce G. Haffty


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
186 KB
Volume
117
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recent data from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5194 (E5194) prospectively defined a low‐risk subset of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients where radiation therapy was omitted after lumpectomy alone. The purpose of the study was to determine the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in DCIS patients who met the criteria of E5194 treated with lumpectomy and adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS:

A total of 263 patients with DCIS were treated between 1980 and 2009 who met the enrollment criteria for E5194: 1) low to intermediate grade (LIG) with size >0.3 cm but <2.5 cm and margins >3 mm (n = 196), or 2) high grade (HG), size <1 cm and margins >3 mm (n = 67). All patients were treated with lumpectomy and whole breast RT with a boost to a median total tumor bed dose of 6400 cGy. Standard statistical analyses were performed with SAS (v. 9.2).

RESULTS:

The average follow‐up time was 6.9 years. The 5‐year and 7‐year IBTR for the LIG cohort in this study was 1.5% and 4.4% compared with 6.1% and 10.5% in E5194, respectively. The 5‐year and 7‐year IBTR for the HG cohort was 2.0% and 2.0% in this study compared with 15.3% and 18% in E5194, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy reduced the rate of local recurrence by more than 70% in patients with DCIS who met the criteria of E5194 (6.1% to 1.5% in the LIG cohort and 15.3% to 2% in the HG cohort). Additional follow‐up is necessary given that 70% of IBTRs occurred after 5 years. Cancer 2011. Β© 2010 American Cancer Society.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ductal carcinoma in situ treated with br
✍ Sharad Goyal; Frank Vicini; Peter D. Beitsch; Henry Kuerer; Martin Keisch; Sabin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 133 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients treated in the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial who met the criteria for E5194 treated w

Long term follow-up of women with ductal
✍ Kimberly J. Van Zee; Laura Liberman; Billur Samli; Katherine N. Tran; Beryl McCo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 131 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. Although in recent years there has been a dramatic increase in both the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and breast-conserving therapy for patients who have this disease, the optimal treatment for these patients remains controversial. Most data regarding outcomes have co