β Scribed by D. Mahalel; D. Zaidel; T. Klein
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
The paper describes the background and evaluates the effectiveness of a flashing green phase just before the amber leading to red phase in the traffic signal cycle. This type of signal sequence, practiced in Israel and a few other countries, was thought to provide drivers with useAfl information which should lead to better stop or go decisions. However, accident analysis studies have sho~n an increase in collisions following the introduction of a flashing green. A laborato U simulation study designed to explain the accident findings was conducted. It was found that the flashing green elicited from the drivers an earlier decision response and a higher number of inappropriate stopping decisions, particularly c[ose to the intersection. The pattern of stopping and crossing decisions in the flashing green program suggests more friction between stopping and nonstopping vehicles and, therefore, a higher likelihood of front-rear collisions compared to a regular program.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The e}ect of two types of justi\_cation pressure on the decision process was inves! tigated[ Three groups of 04 subjects each had to choose the head of a corrective home for criminal adolescents out of six candidates\ who were described on 05 attributes[ Two groups worked under justi\_cation pressur
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Reconstruction is rarely incorporated into the decisionβmaking process for surgical breast cancer treatment. We examined the importance of knowing about reconstruction to patients' surgical decisionβmaking for breast cancer. ## METHODS. We surveyed women aged β€79 years