𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Domain Perturbation for Elliptic Equations Subject to Robin Boundary Conditions

✍ Scribed by E.N. Dancer; D. Daners


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
568 KB
Volume
138
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-0396

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We prove domain perturbation theorems for linear and nonlinear elliptic equations under Robin boundary conditions. The theory allows very singular perturbation of domains. In particular, it includes cutting holes, parts degenerating to a set of measure zero such as the dumbbell problem, or wildly oscillating boundaries. In the last case we show that the limiting problem is the Dirichlet problem. 1997 Academic Press behave as the domains 0 n approach an open bounded set 0. Here, 2 is the Laplace operator, & the outer unit normal to the boundary 0 n of 0 n and ; 0 >0 a constant. Unlike in the case of Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions the boundary conditions in the limit may be different from the original ones. This depends on how the domains 0 n approach 0. We shall prove three perturbation results, each featuring a different behaviour when passing to the limit.

First, we suppose that the boundary of the original problem is only modified in the neighbourhood of a very small set, that is, a set of capacity zero. Examples of that type include rounding off corners, cutting or drilling small holes of any shape. It also includes examples where part of a domain degenerates such as in the dumbbell problem, where the handle shrinks to a line as in Fig. 1. The limiting problem to consider is (1.1) on the domain article no.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the Lp–Lq maximal regularity for Stok
✍ Rieko Shimada πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 328 KB

## Abstract We obtain the __L__~__p__~–__L__~__q__~ maximal regularity of the Stokes equations with Robin boundary condition in a bounded domain in ℝ^__n__^ (__n__β©Ύ2). The Robin condition consists of two conditions: __v__ β‹… __u__=0 and Ξ±__u__+Ξ²(__T__(__u__, __p__)__v__ – γ€ˆ__T__(__u__, __p__)__v__,