‘Doing things differently’—working towards distributed responsibility within memory assessment services
✍ Scribed by Sean Page; Kevin Hope; Chris Maj; Dr Jose Mathew; Dr Penny Bee
- Book ID
- 102227292
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 101 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
- DOI
- 10.1002/gps.2716
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Objectives
To compare initial diagnostic hypotheses made by Allied Health Professionals (AHP) (mental health nurses, occupational therapists and social workers) with subsequent formal multidisciplinary formulation based upon the full possession of investigations, neuropsychological tests and brain imaging. Design Prospective analysis.
Design
Prospective analysis.
Setting
Home‐based assessments, secondary care based multidisciplinary memory clinic.
Participants
90 consecutive referrals over a 3‐month period.
Results
Fifty eight patients (64.4%) were diagnosed by the multi‐disciplinary team as having a dementia. Twenty (34%) were classified as Alzheimer's disease, 28 (49%) of mixed sub‐type and 9 (16%) of vascular origin. Together, AHP's were able to detect dementia with 91% accuracy (Kappa 0.81) sensitivity was 0.88 and specificity 0.97. The diagnostic accuracy for each professional group ranged from 88% to 93% (Kappa 74–90%).
Conclusions
In this study, structured initial assessment by AHP's working in a Memory Assessment Service was shown to be an accurate method of determining a diagnosis of cognitive impairment, when compared with formal MDT judgment. It is suggested that such distributed responsibility affords a viable option for the future detection of early dementia. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES