𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Does the Terminologia Anatomica really matter?

✍ Scribed by Bruce Elliot Hirsch

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
47 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0897-3806

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Terminologia Anatomica: New terminology
Terminologia Anatomica: New terminology for the new anatomist
✍ Whitmore, Ian πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 58 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Over many years, anatomical terminology has been the subject of much controversy and disagreement. Previously, the International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee has been responsible for the production of six editions of Nomina Anatomica. In 1989 a new committee, the Federative Committee on Anatomi

HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY?
HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY?
✍ ANITA M. McGAHAN; MICHAEL E. PORTER πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 167 KB

In this paper, we examine the importance of year, industry, corporate-parent, and businessspecific effects on the profitability of U.S. public corporations within specific 4-digit SIC categories. Our results indicate that year, industry, corporate-parent, and business-specific effects account for 2

The anomaly of size: Does it really matt
The anomaly of size: Does it really matter?
✍ Ian M. Dobbs πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 176 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Recent work on the 'size effect' suggests that size-related regularities in asset prices (such as size, leverage, book to market equity, etc.) should not be regarded as anomalies. This paper first clarifies the argument (by showing why the OLS cross-section regression incorporating size-related vari

Does saving really matter for growth? Me
Does saving really matter for growth? Mexico (1970–2000)
✍ Maite Alguacil; Ana Cuadros; Vicente Orts πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 101 KB

## Abstract This paper uses the Granger non‐causality test procedure developed by Toda and Yamamoto (1995) and Dolado and LΓΌtkepohl (1996) to analyse the saving‐growth nexus in Mexico. Contrary to the reverse causation between national saving and domestic income found in recent empirical studies, e