## Abstract The effect of acute exposure to low‐level radio frequency electromagnetic fields (REF) generated by mobile phones on short‐term memory and attention was assessed in two experiments. Most of the tests manipulated task difficulty or what might be termed cognitive load. This manipulation i
Does the economy affect teenage substance use?
✍ Scribed by Jeremy Arkes
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 182 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9230
- DOI
- 10.1002/hec.1132
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
This research examines how teenage drug and alcohol use responds to changes in the economy. In contrast to the recent literature confirming pro‐cyclical alcohol use among adults, this research offers strong evidence that a weaker economy leads to greater teenage marijuana and hard‐drug use and some evidence that a weaker economy also leads to higher teenage alcohol use. The findings are based on logistic models with state and year fixed effects, using teenagers from the NLSY‐1997. The evidence also indicates that teenagers are more likely to sell drugs in weaker economies. This suggests one mechanism for counter‐cyclical drug use – that access to illicit drugs is easier when the economy is weaker. These results also suggest that the strengthening economy in the 1990s mitigated what would otherwise have been much larger increases in teenage drug use. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This paper models heterogeneity in the relationship between exposure to information at school or in the media and cannabis use and heavy drinking, using latent class techniques applied to data on French teenagers collected in 1993. Teenagers cluster in five classes which differ in their
## Abstract ## Objectives We employed the placebo‐caffeine paradigm to test whether the presence or absence of a substance (caffeine) influences the placebo effect. Methods: In experiment 1 consisting of four conditions with __n__ = 15 participants each (control, placebo, two double‐blind groups,