Does order of presentation affect users' judgment of documents?
β Scribed by Purgailis Parker, Lorraine M. ;Johnson, Robert E.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 206 KB
- Volume
- 41
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0002-8231
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
User evaluation of the relevance of documents retrieved by an information system can be a useful measure of the performance of the system. The meaningfulness of this measure is, in part, determined by the extent to which it is influenced by external factors. This article examines the question of whether the order of presentation of the document citations influences the relevance judgment of the user. An experiment to test the hypothesis that order of presentation does have an effect is described. The results indicate that users are not influenced by this factor when the set of retrieved document citations has fewer than 15 members.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Studies concerned with the evaluation of information systems have typically relied on judgments of relevance as the fundamental measure in determining system performance. In most cases, subjects are asked to assign a relevance score using some category rating scale (l-4, l-11, or simply relevant/non
Family practice physicians read a case vignette describing a patient with a history of lung cancer, a new transient neurological disturbance, and a normal computerized tomographic (CT) scan of the head. They then estimated the probabilities of two diagnoses: transient ischemic attack (TIA) and brain
Time series found in areas such as marketing and sales often have regular established patterns which are occasionally aected by exogenous inΒ―uences, such as sales promotions. While statistical forecasting methods are adept at extrapolating regular patterns in series, judgmental forecasters have a po