Does new public management work in reforming the state's role in agricultural marketing in developing countries?
โ Scribed by Michael Hubbard; Marisol Smith
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 70 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0954-1748
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The research investigated the extent to which `new public management' style reforms (in which the state conยฎnes itself to contracting, guiding, facilitating and ยฎnancing in providing public services, rather than delivering them itself through civil service organizations) are successful in the institutional context of developing countries. Studies of reform of public services to agricultural marketing were conducted in Ghana, India, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe, with additional case studies in Ivory Coast and Kenya. While the broad direction of change is towards liberalized markets, reforms of government organizations in agricultural marketing are much slower than reforms to liberalize domestic trade, owing to low adaptive capacity in government organizations. Other ยฎndings are that reforms have consisted substantially of eorts to create independent agencies and private ยฎrms out of government departments and parastatals (corporatization and commercialization), with much less done to facilitate private sector development, or undertake contracting and new forms of regulation. Private sector development has suered from underfunded infrastructure and receives little of substance from the reforms of government beyond market deregulation. Examples of successful innovation are identi-ยฎed which may have potential for replication.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Mention the words `public sector reform' and many listeners will take it for granted that you are talking about the new public management. Administrative reform is nowadays easily equated with the reduction of centralized procedural rules, an emphasis on `outputs', the separation of purchaser and pr
Governments of developing countries, often under pressure from donors as well as from internal forces for change, are re-thinking their service provision roles. The new conventional view is that, where possible, government should enable and regulate the private and community sectors or arms-length p