𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Does hormone treatment added to radiotherapy improve outcome in locally advanced prostate cancer? : Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

✍ Scribed by Emilio Bria; Federica Cuppone; Diana Giannarelli; Michele Milella; Enzo Maria Ruggeri; Isabella Sperduti; Paola Pinnarò; Edmondo Terzoli; Francesco Cognetti; Paolo Carlini


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
361 KB
Volume
115
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To quantify the magnitude of benefit of the addition of hormone treatment (HT) to exclusive radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer, a literature‐based meta‐analysis was conducted.

METHODS:

Event‐based relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived through a random‐effect model. Differences in primary (biochemical failure and clinical progression‐free survival) and secondary outcomes (cancer‐specific survival, overall survival [OS], recurrence patterns, and toxicity) were explored. Absolute differences and numbers of patients needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. A heterogeneity test, a metaregression analysis with clinical predictors of outcome, and a correlation analysis for surrogate endpoints were also performed.

RESULTS:

Seven trials (4387 patients) were gathered. Hormone suppression significantly decreased both biochemical failure (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70‐0.82; P < .0001) and clinical progression‐free survival (RR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.71‐0.93; P = .002), with absolute differences of 10% and 7.7%, respectively, which translates into 10 and 13 NNT. cancer‐specific survival (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69‐0.83; P < .0001) and OS (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80‐0.93; P < .0001) were also significantly improved by the addition of HT, without significant heterogeneity, with absolute differences of 5.5% and 4.9%, respectively, which translates into 18 and 20 NNT. Local and distant relapse were significantly decreased by HT, by 36% and 28%, respectively, and no significant differences in toxicity were found. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were significantly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hormone suppression plus radiotherapy significantly decreases recurrence and mortality of patients with localized prostate cancer, without affecting toxicity. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Estimating survival gain for economic ev
✍ N. Neymark; I. Adriaenssen; T. Gorlia; S. Caleo; M. Bolla 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 240 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The problem of estimating expected outcomes for the economic evaluation of treatments for which the outcome of principal interest is (quality adjusted) survival time has so far not received sufficient attention in the literature. The best estimate of expected survival is mean survival t

Impact of nutrition support on treatment
✍ Rachel Rabinovitch; Barbara Grant; Brian A. Berkey; David Raben; Kie Kian Ang; K 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 163 KB 👁 1 views

## Background: The aim was to evaluate the relationship between nutrition support (ns) on host toxicity and cancer outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnscc) undergoing definitive radiotherapy (xrt). ## Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of rad