Do perceptions of punishment vary between white-collar and street crimes?

✍ Scribed by Andrea Schoepfer; Stephanie Carmichael; Nicole Leeper Piquero

• Publisher: Elsevier Science
• Year: 2007
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 237 KB
• Volume: 35
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0047-2352
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.01.003

✦ Synopsis

Much has been learned about the relationship between sanction threat perceptions and criminal activity, yet little remains known about the factors that are associated with sanction threat perceptions. Moreover, because most researchers had studied deterrence within the context of street crime, even less is known about the factors that relate to sanction threat perceptions for white-collar crime. This study used data from a national probability sample to examine whether the determinants of perceived sanction certainty and severity for street crime were different from white-collar crime. Using robbery and fraud as two exemplars, the findings indicated that while public perceptions of sanction certainty and severity suggested that street criminals were more likely to be caught and be sentenced to more severe sanctions than white-collar criminals, respondent's perceptions of which type of crime should be more severely punished indicated that both robbery and fraud were equally likely to be perceived 'on par.' Additional results indicated that the correlates of certainty and severity were more similar than different, but that the results differed according to whether respondents were asked about the punishment that white-collar offenders were likely to receive as opposed to what they should receive.