The process of model performance evaluation is of primary importance, not only in the model development and calibration process, but also when communicating the results to other researchers and to stakeholders. The basic 'rule' is that every modelling result should be put into context, for example,
Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals
β Scribed by Robert E. Criss; William E. Winston
- Book ID
- 102265267
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 94 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6087
- DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.7072
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Schaefli and Gupta (2007) point out the need for useful metrics to evaluate and compare the performance of hydrologic models, make helpful suggestions and invite discussion. They discuss the shortcomings of the 'Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency', hereafter NSE, originally proposed by Nash and Sutcliffe (1970):
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract An Erratum has been published for this article in Journal of Organizational Behavior 26(7) 2005, 873. Previous research on the relationship between alternative employment opportunities and cooperation has neglected the distinction between evaluations and restrictions. Thus, one cannot