𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products

✍ Scribed by Catherine C. Smith; Michael C. Aylott; Krishna J. Fisher; Anthony M. Lynch; Nigel J. Gooderham


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
200 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
1099-498X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA.

Methods

To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR).

Results

The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (>4‐fold) or MMS (>5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector.

Conclusions

The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Direct Cellular Responses to Platinum-In
✍ Yongwon Jung; Stephen J. Lippard 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 11 KB

## Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract, please click on HTML or PDF.

Survival Responses of Human Embryonic St
✍ Tera M. Filion; Meng Qiao; Prachi N. Ghule; Matthew Mandeville; Andre J. van Wij 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 319 KB

## Abstract Pluripotent human embryonic stem (hES) cells require mechanisms to maintain genomic integrity in response to DNA damage that could compromise competency for lineage‐commitment, development, and tissue‐renewal. The mechanisms that protect the genome in rapidly proliferating hES cells are

ZNF143 activates gene expression in resp
✍ Hiroshi Ishiguchi; Hiroto Izumi; Takayuki Torigoe; Yoichiro Yoshida; Hiroshi Kub 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 743 KB

## Abstract We have identified a cisplatin‐inducible gene, the __mitochondrial ribosomal protein S11__ (__MRP S11__) gene, by means of mRNA differential display. Functional analysis of the __MRP__ S11 promoter showed that a Staf binding site in the promoter is required for both basal promoter activ

Functions of human replication protein A
✍ Yue Zou; Yiyong Liu; Xiaoming Wu; Steven M. Shell 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 178 KB

## Abstract Human replication protein A (RPA), a heterotrimeric protein complex, was originally defined as a eukaryotic single‐stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein essential for the in vitro replication of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA. Since then RPA has been found to be an indispensable player in almo

Repair Responses to DNA Damage: Enzymati
✍ Philip C. Hanawalt; Priscilla K. Cooper; Ann K. Ganesan; R. Stephen Lloyd; Charl 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 884 KB

## Abstract Bacteria and eukaryotic cells employ a variety of enzymatic pathways to remove damage from DNA or to lessen its impact upon cellular functions. Most of these processes were discovered in Escherichia coli and have been most extensively analyzed in this organism because suitable mutants h