๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Distal splenorenal vs. portal-systemic shunts after hemorrhage from varices: A randomized controlled trial

โœ Scribed by Norman D. Grace; Harold O. Conn; Robert H. Resnick; Roberto J. Groszmann; Colin E. Atterbury; Stephen C. Wright; Richard J. Gusberg; Rudolph Vollman; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Rosemarie L. Fisher; Edward T. O'Hara; William V. McDermott; J. Peter Maselli; Warren Widrich; Daniel S. Matloff; Douglas Horst; Naomi Banks; Jeanne Alberts


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
812 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-9139

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Between 1975 and 1983, 303

cirrhotic patients with endoscopically proven major variceal hemorrhage were admitted to the participating hospitals of the Boston-New Haven Collaborative Liver Group. Of these, 274 were evaluated for admission to a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing portal-systemic shunts with distal splenorenal shunts. The criteria for inclusion were as follows: (i) a portohepatic pressure gradient 212 mmHg; (ii) angiographic evidence of antegrade portal venous flow; (iii) angiographic demonstration that the inferior vena cava and portal, splenic and left renal veins were anatomically suitable for either a portalsystemic or distal splenorenal shunt, and (iv) the patient was a reasonable operative risk. Eighty-one patients from the six participating hospitals fulfilled the criteria and consented to participate. Thirty-eight patients were randomly assigned to have portal-systemic shunt and 4 3 to have distal splenorenal shunt.

After a follow-up period of 11 years (mean = 3.5 years for all patients), survival was found to be similar in the two groups of patients. The 30-day operative mortality was 13% for the portal-systemic shunt group and 9% for the distal splenorenal shunt patients. Late mortality was 55% for the portal-systemic shunt and 37% for the distal splenorenal shunt group. Total mortality was 68% for the portal-systemic shunt and 46% for the distal sple-


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Distal splenorenal shunt vs. portal-syst
โœ H. O. Conn; R. H. Resnick; N. D. Grace; C. E. Atterbury; D. Horst; R. J. Groszma ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 1002 KB

A prospective controlled comparison of portal-systemic (PSS) and distal splenorenal shunts (DSRS) in cirrhotic patients who had survived hemorrhage from esophagogastric varices was undertaken 5 yr ago at five hospitals by the Boston-New Haven Collaborative Liver Group. The clinical and endoscopic cr

Sclerotherapy vs. esophageal transection
โœ Seigo Kitano; Yasunori Iso; Makoto Hashizume; Hirohiko Yamaga; Nobuhiro Koyanagi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 691 KB

Ninety-six patients with good liver function (Child class A or B) and esophageal varices were randomly assigned to one of three groups given different treatments: endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (n = 32), esophageal transection (n = 32) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 32). Five patients (5.2%) h