## Abstract Public reporting of hospital performance holds tremendous promise for improving the care provided by hospitals. To date, however, consumers have failed to embrace public reporting, despite considerable efforts to promote it. We review a number of reasons that public reporting has failed
Dissecting hospital quality. Antecedents of clinical and perceived quality in hospitals
✍ Scribed by Javier García-Lacalle; Patricia Bachiller
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 145 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0749-6753
- DOI
- 10.1002/hpm.1076
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
SUMMARY
Clinical quality (CQ) and patient satisfaction (PS) are key elements on the agenda of European public healthcare systems. This paper seeks to explore the relationship between CQ and PS, at hospital level, as freedom of hospital choice may lead to a trade‐off between them. In addition, the paper studies the influence of some factors—location, size, case‐mix, length of stay and occupancy rate (OR)—on hospital clinical and perceived quality. Correlation analyses and the linear mixed‐effect methodology are used. The study focuses on the Andalusian Health Service, one of the biggest European public health services, and covers the years from 2002 to 2006. The results indicate that CQ and perceived quality are not related. The ‘volume‐expertise’ effect is not confirmed in our study, but we find a ‘complexity‐expertise’ effect, i.e. attending more complex cases may improve CQ. Shorter hospitalizations and higher ORs might negatively affect CQ. Location, size, case‐mix and ORs significantly affect PS. Hospitals with better patient assessments might attract patients without providing a better clinical care. Caution should be taken when evaluating hospital performance and implementing reforms to improve hospital efficiency as quality may be harmed. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Information about a hospital accreditation program generally goes unpublished, and when published, it is seldom used to analyse the quality performance in a group of hospitals. This article uses the information derived from the Accreditation Program of Hospitals in Catalunya to assess the quality of
## Abstract Concerns about deficiencies in the quality of care delivered in US hospitals grew during a time period when an increasing number of hospitals were experiencing financial problems. Our study examines a six‐year longitudinal database of general acute care hospitals in 11 states to assess
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND In April 2005 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services launched “Hospital Compare,” the first government‐sponsored hospital quality scorecard. We compared the ranking of __U.S. News and World Report__'s “Best Hospitals” with Hospital Compare performance ratings. ##
## SUMMARY One of the most significant developments in the quest for quality, transparency, and accountability in healthcare is the construction and the implementation of indicator‐based technologies. In Denmark, this development has been relatively pronounced, and based on an extensive document st
## Abstract It is generally accepted that an understanding of quality conceptualizations is instrumental in the design and development of customer care programs. This study applies the dimensional qualitative research approach to develop a conceptual model, which demonstrates the antecedents and co