𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction versus single-drop microextraction for the determination of several endocrine-disrupting phenols from seawaters

✍ Scribed by Jessica López-Darias; Mónica Germán-Hernández; Verónica Pino; Ana M. Afonso

Book ID
116904044
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
470 KB
Volume
80
Category
Article
ISSN
0039-9140

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Headspace single drop and hollow fiber l
Headspace single drop and hollow fiber liquid phase microextractions for HPLC determination of phenols
✍ Yunli Wu; Bin Hu; Yanli Hou 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 664 KB

## Abstract Two methods based on headspace single drop microextraction (HS‐SDME) and headspace hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HS‐HF‐LPME) were developed and critically compared with HPLC‐UV determination of phenols (including phenol (Ph), 2‐chlorophenol (CP), 2,4‐dichlorophenol (DCP) an

Dispersion-solidification liquid–liquid
Dispersion-solidification liquid–liquid microextraction for volatile aromatic hydrocarbons determination: Comparison with liquid phase microextraction based on the solidification of a floating drop
✍ Vida Vickackaite; Edita Pusvaskiene 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 475 KB

## Abstract Two microextraction techniques – liquid phase microextraction based on solidification of a floating organic drop (LPME‐SFO) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with a solidification of a floating organic drop (DLLME‐SFO) – are explored for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzen