✦ LIBER ✦

Disingenuousness Rejoined: : A “Candide” Response to Dr. Pangloss

✍ Scribed by CHARLES E. FRAZIER; E. WILBUR BOCK

Book ID: 111361622
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 187 KB
Volume: 22
Category: Article
ISSN: 0011-1384
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00293.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A response to Dr. Weinstein

✍ Lorenzo Magnani 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 40 KB

A Response to Dr. Strenski

✍ Walter H. Capps 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 278 KB

Response to Dr. C. McDonald and Dr. A. M

Response to Dr. C. McDonald and Dr. A. McDonald

✍ Dr. Thomas Mancuso 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

The comment about "a typical latent period" is misleading and my response was previously stated in the reply to Ohlson [ 19891. Essentially, the latent periods for the various studies are a reflection of the definition time of the cohorts and the period of follow-up. The Mancuso study by the very na

Human response to a malaria vaccine cand

Human response to a malaria vaccine candidate antigen

✍ S. Biswas; Y.D. Sharma 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 237 KB

Response to Dr S. S. A. Bekhit

✍ Maora Zigmond; Ayala Stabholz; Joseph Shapira; Gilad Bachrach; Gavriel Chaushu; 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 39 KB

Response Letter to Dr J.A. Impellizeri

✍ A. Kummeling 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 35 KB