๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Discussion of Roberto Quartesan's paper

โœ Scribed by Christopher J Keats


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
88 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
1742-3341

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In this evocative, sensitive report of work with Ms A in Perugia, Italy, Roberto Quartesan shows the effectiveness of psychological interventions in the treatment of a schizophrenic woman in conjunction with pharmacologic and rehabilitative strategies. This integration reflects a broadly psychoanalytic approach, one distinguished not by use of the couch, but instead by use of the therapist and his understanding of unconscious process, dynamic motivation, defensive and adaptive function, and the reciprocal influence of transference and countertransference. Moreover, in describing the changes in the transference position of Ms A, Dr Quartesan demonstrates that the centerpiece of an analytically informed treatment of a schizophrenic person is in fact the analytic work, not only the way it edifies the treatment team, or provides a theoretical basis for a multi-modal approach. Dr Quartesan's method was based in large part on his careful study of the delivery of care at Chestnut Lodge Hospital in Rockville, Maryland. He visited the hospital frequently in the 1980s and 1990s, often staying for prolonged periods. David Feinsilver's (1986) model for comprehensive treatment, itself developed at Chestnut Lodge, was a particular inspiration to Dr Quartesan. The current report of Dr Quartesan comes at a time when the place of psychodynamic therapies in the treatment of schizophrenia is newly being debated. The debate, however, has suffered from a failure to recognize changes in analytic theory and technique, and misunderstanding about what it means to apply psychoanalytic principles in the treatment of severely disturbed patients. Even before more recent understanding of biological aspects of the illness, analytically trained colleagues questioned whether analysis alone could cure schizophrenia. Sigmund Freud said, in the case of Paul Schreber, that analysis would not succeed with paranoid patients because they did not cathect others, including of course therapists, and this interfered with analysis of transference


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Discussion of Dr. Hegyeli's paper
โœ Stanitski, Carl L. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1971 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 173 KB
Discussion of Christine Hill's paper
โœ Stuart W. Twemlow ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 61 KB
Discussion on Dr. Hamburger's paper
โœ Muspratt, E. K. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1884 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) โš– 532 KB

for sntnplitig in all tradcs. 11 twenty-five ycnrs' cs-~~cricncc of snittplitig n substnnce iit ~vliicli nccutacy of sntiigling wns or tltc w r y first ini~rortnnce con-~ittcctl liitit tltnt there wcro tltrcc rcqiiisitcs for tlic snnilhr-intcgrit , cs~ierieitcc, atid Imtns. \Vlintc~cr c~nss of goot~