𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Discussion: Ghiselin and Mayr on species

✍ Scribed by Laurance Splitter

Book ID
104862424
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
373 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0169-3867

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Why does the nature of species matter? c
Why does the nature of species matter? comments on Ghiselin and Mayr
πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 343 KB

difficulty in understanding what a biological population is, citing a remark I made in response to an argument of Elliott Sober's. But Mayr has quite failed to understand the point of discussion between Sober and me. In (Kitcher 1984a), I alleged that it was possible for "instant speciation" to occu

Ghostly whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and th
Ghostly whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the β€œPhilosophers” on the ontological status of species
πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 510 KB

are those between departments, I would prefer not to discuss these issues in terms of academic disciplines. I think that philosophers of science and scientists are engaged in the same activity. All that distinguishes us is emphasis and training. Mutual understanding would be enhanced if we were some

Sex and the individuality of species: A
Sex and the individuality of species: A response to Ghiselin
✍ Brent D. Mishler; Robert N. Brandon πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 190 KB

The short answer to the question posed by Ghiselin (1989) in his first paragraph is no. A fallacious argument is one whose premises fail to support its conclusion. One type of fallacious argument is argument by ad hominem attack, e.g., when one supports one's position by impugning the motives or cha