𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS FOR WORKING GROUP 2 BENCHMARKS

✍ Scribed by K. WORDEN

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
86 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0888-3270

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

This section of the COST special issue is concerned with discussing the results from the working group two benchmarking exercise.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

COST ACTION F3 ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS: B
COST ACTION F3 ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS: BENCHMARKS FOR WORKING GROUP 2β€”STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING
✍ K. WORDEN πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 77 KB

This section of the COST special issue is concerned with the results from the Working Group 2 benchmarking exercise in Structural Health Monitoring. Data from two largescale structures were modelled for the purposes of damage detection, location and quantification.

Discussion for β€˜indexes of contrast and
Discussion for β€˜indexes of contrast and quantitative significance for comparisons of two groups’
✍ Gary G. Koch πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 74 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The paper by Feinstein provides clear and interesting discussion for interpreting indexes which describe disparity between two groups. The discussion is most helpful in explaining the logical relationships among alternative indexes, and in identifying their strengths and weaknesses. Feinstein quite

Vitamin D working group WG1–WG2
Vitamin D working group WG1–WG2
πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 🌐 English βš– 127 KB