## SUMMARY Attribute generation for discrete choice experiments (DCEs) is often poorly reported, and it is unclear whether this element of research is conducted rigorously. This paper explores issues associated with developing attributes for DCEs and contrasts different qualitative approaches. The
✦ LIBER ✦
Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods
✍ Scribed by Juha Siikamäki; David F. Layton
- Book ID
- 116637223
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 271 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0095-0696
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Using qualitative methods for attribute
✍
Joanna Coast; Hareth Al-Janabi; Eileen J. Sutton; Susan A. Horrocks; A. Jane Vos
📂
Article
📅
2011
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 112 KB
Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice e
✍
Dimitris Potoglou; Peter Burge; Terry Flynn; Ann Netten; Juliette Malley; Julien
📂
Article
📅
2011
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 687 KB
The use of alternative preference elicit
✍
Yoo, Hong Il; Doiron, Denise
📂
Article
📅
2013
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 883 KB
Does the number of choice sets matter? R
✍
Mickael Bech; Trine Kjaer; Jørgen Lauridsen
📂
Article
📅
2011
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 145 KB
Optimising the design of discrete choice experiments (DCE) involves maximising not only the statistical efficiency, but also how the nature and complexity of the experiment itself affects model parameters and variance. The present paper contributes by investigating the impact of the number of DCE ch
PSU23 Women's Preferences for Breast Rec
✍
C. Tang
📂
Article
📅
2012
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 57 KB
Modeling improvements in booster seat us
✍
Charles E. Cunningham; Beth S. Bruce; Anne W. Snowdon; Yvonne Chen; Carol Kolga;
📂
Article
📅
2011
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 428 KB