## Abstract When health effects can be valued in monetary terms, as in cost–benefit analysis, they should be discounted at the same rate as costs. If health effects are measured in quantities (e.g. quality adjusted life years) as in cost‐effectiveness analysis (CEA) and the value of health effects
Discounting, Preferences, and Paternalism in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
✍ Scribed by Gustav Tinghög
- Book ID
- 113066379
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 260 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1065-3058
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## SUMMARY Nord (2011) criticizes standard arguments which assert that consistency requires that future health benefits must be discounted at the same rate as future costs in cost‐effectiveness analysis (CEA). He suggests these arguments are misguided because they require transitivity of preference
Using a simple societal utility function-giving equal weight to current and future generations -it is concluded that costs need to be discounted on the basis of the expected increase in income and the marginal utility of consumption, and that effects need to be discounted on the basis of the expecte