๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Disability and rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after treatment

โœ Scribed by Olson, Marian L. ;Shedd, Donald P.


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
1978
Weight
589 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-6403

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

In an effort to obtain quantitative and qualitative information regarding the extent of disability sustained following definitive treatment for head and neck cancer, 51 patientsโ€“28 who had had laryngectomy and 23 who had had other major surgeryโ€“were interviewed. Also examined were the types of rehabilitation measures taken. In all cases, the following areas in which disability could occur were identified and explored: physical appearance, speech, deglutition, mastication, salivation, sensory deficits, cranial motorโ€nerve deficits, pain, nutrition, activities of daily living, psychosocial functioning, vocational status, environmental parameters, and delayed complications. Where appropriate, ratings and delineations of severity were compiled. Nine methods of rehabilitation were assessed with regard to frequency of utilization: surgical reconstruction, dentalโ€maxillofacial prosthetics, speech therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation nursing, occupational therapy, vocational rehabilitation, rehabilitation counseling, and social service. Our conclusions were that half of the patients studied had sustained significant disability in three to four areas, while 43% had moderate or severe disability in five to nine areas. Additionally, the head and neck surgeon was found to have used surgical reconstructive and dentalโ€maxillofacial prosthetic measures, as well as the services of seven categories of allied health professionals, to provide rehabilitation.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Driving behaviors in patients with head
โœ Hon K. Yuen; Marion B. Gillespie; Terry A. Day; Larissa Morgan; Jerry K. Burik ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 115 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. The purpose of this study was to explore the driving behaviors of head and neck cancer patients during and after cancer therapy. ## Methods. Eightyโ€three patients completed a questionnaire related to driving behaviors. ## Results. The survey revealed that 67.5% of re

Methylphenidate treatment of patients wi
โœ Fernandez, Francisco ;Adams, Frank ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) โš– 491 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Five organically impaired and depressed head and neck cancer patients had a marked therapeutic response to methylphenidate (MPD). There was a rapid remission of depressive and cognitive dysfunctions without adverse side effects. The relationship of cognitive, behavioral, and affective symptoms to br

Pain in the head and neck cancer patient
โœ Keefe, Francis J. ;Manuel, Gerdenio ;Brantley, Alton ;Crisson, James ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) โš– 747 KB

The incidence, severity, and location of pain was evaluated in 30 head and neck cancer patients prior to treatment after the first phase of their treatment and upon the completion of treatment. The incidence of pain was relatively high (40%-70%) and tended to increase slightly over treatment. Patien

Prioritizing treatment outcomes: Head an
โœ Marcy A. List; Judith Lee Rutherford; John Stracks; Barbara Roa Pauloski; Jerily ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 96 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. Treatment decisions in head and neck cancer (HNC) might involve consideration of uncertain tradeoffs of one late effect against another or increasing toxicity or residual impairment for increased chance of survival. Understanding how patients prioritize potential outcome