𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Dimensional indicators of generalized anxiety disorder severity for DSM-V

✍ Scribed by Andrea N. Niles; Richard T. Lebeau; Betty Liao; Daniel E. Glenn; Michelle G. Craske


Book ID
116610904
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
333 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0887-6185

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Generalized worry disorder: a review of
✍ Gavin Andrews; Megan J. Hobbs; Thomas D. Borkovec; Katja Beesdo; Michelle G. Cra πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 168 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has undergone a series of substantial classificatory changes since its first inclusion in DSM-III. The majority of these revisions have been in response to its poor inter-rater reliability and concerns that it may lack diagnostic validity. This article

Comparison of RDC, DSM-III, DSM-III-R di
✍ Susan I. Wolk; Ewald Horwath; Rise B. Goldstein; Priya Wickramaratne; Myrna M. W πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 827 KB

The diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has been controversial since its inception. It remains unclear whether more stringent diagnostic crite- ria, such as in DSM-III-R, have improved the validity of GAD. Family studies suggest that GAD aggregates at least weakly in families of probands

The validity of the associated symptom c
✍ Carolyn L. Turvey; Denise E. Stevens; Kathleen R. Merikangas πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 73 KB

## Abstract In light of the poor reliability and discriminant validity of the DSM‐III‐R criteria for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), extensive modifications were implemented in the development of the DSM‐IV criteria. This study compares the discriminant validity of the DSM‐III‐R and DSM‐IV crit