Differentiating among racial/ethnic groups and its implications for understanding juvenile justice decision making
✍ Scribed by Michael J. Leiber; Joseph Johnson; Kristan Fox; Robyn Lacks
- Book ID
- 104021378
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 233 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0047-2352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Both theory and research have been refined to gain a better understanding of when race and ethnicity matter in justice proceedings. In the present research, this line of inquiry was continued by differentiating among minority youth to assess the extent being African American, Native American, and Asian American influenced juvenile justice decision making and how these effects compared to one another and Whites. Utilizing an interpretation of the symbolic threat thesis that emphasizes stereotyping, the authors anticipated Native Americans to be responded to more severely than African Americans, followed by Asian Americans who were anticipated to be responded to more like Whites. The results indicated partial support for these expectations.